| Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
1940 Split Back Seat ID
-- page:
1
2
|
|
40Tudor |
11-09-2025 @ 1:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 2025
|
Hello all - I have a 1940 Tudor that came with more modern bucket seats. I found a spilt back front seat locally and the seller said it was from a 1940 coupe. I brought it home and it does have the rear facing foot rests, so thinking it's for a sedan - but the mounting holes don't line up with what I have. My Tudor seat mounting holes are spaced 11" front to back, and ~38" wide across. On the seat I bought, the mounting bracket holes measure 12" front to back by 36-1/2" across. I did find a tag under the seat I bought that reads the following: 433D115RSB 01A7063100 Anyone able to decode the seat tag? Looking to validate what I bought to see if I can make it work. Thank you
|
nelsb01 |
11-09-2025 @ 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1095
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I believe that the 01A - 70-63100 is the year 01A (1940) 70 (body style Tudor) 63100 (part number)
|
40Tudor |
11-09-2025 @ 4:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 2025
|
Thanks for that info. Someone in the past may have changed the mounting track on the seat. The mounting holes and nuts underneath my 40 look original.
This message was edited by 40Tudor on 11-9-25 @ 4:20 PM
|
kubes40 |
11-10-2025 @ 6:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3573
Joined: Oct 2009
|
That seat you bought was from a Tudor as advised. It should fit your coupe without any modification required. My bet is you are missing the "feet" depicted in my photo...those would "correct" the spacing.
Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
trjford8 |
11-10-2025 @ 8:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 4351
Joined: Oct 2009
|
40 Tudor if you need those feet shown by Kube send me a private message as I think I have a set.
|
40Tudor |
11-10-2025 @ 12:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 2025
|
Thanks all. I am looking to make this work in my 40 Tudor. The feet (and track?) are different on my seat. While the tag hog-ringed to the seat looks original, a PO may have changed the tracks. This is the seat/track I am working with:
|
kubes40 |
11-10-2025 @ 5:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3573
Joined: Oct 2009
|
What you have (tracks) are the second of two designs utilized in 1940. The second design was simpler and most likely more economical to produce. The fit was the same as the earlier design. I have attached a photo that depicts both designs. Might you post more photos of the seat you have?
Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
40Tudor |
11-11-2025 @ 5:52 AM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 2025
|
More pictures.
|
trjford8 |
11-11-2025 @ 9:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 4351
Joined: Oct 2009
|
Those tracks look correct to me. They are the later track style.
This message was edited by trjford8 on 11-11-25 @ 9:50 AM
|
40Tudor |
11-12-2025 @ 6:42 AM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 2025
|
Thanks for the confirmation. When I removed the "hot rod" bucket seats, I remember seeing what looked like original captive nuts underneath for the track. I'll go under again and see if there are other holes I missed...
|